Landlord Attorney and Eviction Service Directory
Eviction of Reluctant Previous Owners After Foreclosure
Access Evictions Home Page
Free Eviction Notice Forms and other Landlord-Tenant Forms
Retainer Agreement
The Eviction Process
Fast Track Eviction
Pay-As-You-Go Eviction
Contact Us - start the eviction process today
Seattle Just Cause Evictions and Landlord - Tenant Law
Commercial Evictions in Washington
Frequently Asked Questions
Articles on Landlord -Tenant and Eviction Issues
About Us

A successful bidder at a trustee's sale (non-judicial foreclosure) may take possession of the property 20 after the sale.  RCW 61.24.060.  No notice is required for the new owner to evict the previous owners after the 20 period expires.  Savings Bank v. Mink, 49 Wn. App. 204, 741 P.2d 1043 (1987). 

RCW 61.24.060 provides that the purchaser has the right of possession 20 days after the sale and has the right to the summary proceedings of RCW 59.12, the unlawful detainer (i.e. eviction) statute.  Under the eviction statute notice to quit the premises, where required, is a jurisdictional prerequisite.  RCW 59.12.030 lists six situations in which a person in possession may be evicted and what notice is required for each. 
 
The court of Appeals held that, although RCW 61.24.060 fails to specify under which provision of the eviction statute the buyer at foreclosure may proceed, the closest situation was that of a hold-over tenant.  Under the eviction statute a landowner may evict anyone who remains in possession after the expiration of a lease term without serving a pre-eviction notice
 
The court reasoned that the 20-day period was analogous to a lease term for the purposes of the eviction statute.  The court further reasoned that the intention of the legislature, to avoid costly, time-consuming judicial foreclosure proceedings in nonjudicial foreclosure, and to provide expeditious, summary proceedings for the removal of persons in the possession of the property of another under the eviction statute, were best realized under this analysis.  Also, the competing legislative intent of providing an adequate opportunity [or notice] for interested parties to prevent wrongful foreclosure was not prejudiced because the defendant in the eviction action received detailed notices and provides opportunities to cure pursuant to the trustee sale statute. 
Therefore, the court held no notice was required before serving the previous owner with the eviction lawsuit.  
 

888-88-EVICT
(888-883-8428)
Fax 425-671-1219
 

Your Name
Your Phone Number
Your Email Address
A Brief Description of the Situation
Rental Property Zip Code
  

Google

5 Star Rating
(17 Reviews)

Copyright © 2008 T. Scott Eller Law Firm PLLC d/b/a Access Evictions.
All rights reserved. 
 
The Supreme Court of Washington does not recognize certification of specialties in the practice of law. A lawyer may not state or imply that the lawyer is a specialist.  The content of this website is meant only to communicate fields of practice.

Lawyers may state or imply that they practice in a partnership or other organization only when that is a fact. Scott Eller is the sole shareholder of T. Scott Eller Law Firm  PLLC.
 
Nothing in this website is a substitute for legal advice. The information is general in nature. Furthermore, while we update this site frequently and strive to provide quality content, the law is always in flux. The statutes, ordinances, and other legal authority cited and/or published in this website may not always be current. For legal advice on your particular circumstances feel free to contact us.